LEAP C.O. · Founding chapter forming now

Pre-Law

Argue well. Serve justice.

Mock trial, courthouse visits, and real attorneys in your corner — the LEAP Pre-Law chapter is for students who want to advocate, debate, and defend before they ever sit the LSAT.

The four pillars

What members actually get.

Every LEAP chapter runs on the same four pillars — here's what they look like in Pre-Law.

Law firm shadowing

Spend days inside local firms watching how cases actually move.

Legal aid clinics

Support intake and outreach at clinics serving people who can't afford lawyers.

Judicial exposure

Courthouse programs and, where available, time observing with judges.

Nonprofit legal counsel

Assist the lawyers who keep nonprofits running — including LEAP's own.

Attorney mentors

Practicing lawyers across specialties mentor members one-on-one.

Law student guides

Current law students share the honest version of the path.

Debate coaching

Sharpen argumentation with people who argue for a living.

Ethics roundtables

Monthly discussions on real cases and the hard questions inside them.

Mock trial & moot court

Compete in full trials and appellate arguments against other schools.

Courthouse visits

Observe live proceedings and debrief with attorneys after.

Day-in-the-life panels

Prosecutors, defenders, and corporate lawyers compare notes live.

Meet a judge

Small-group sessions with local judges — bring your questions.

Know-your-rights workshops

Teach community members their basic rights — verified hours.

Plain-language help

Help neighbors understand (not receive advice on) common legal documents.

Legal aid intake support

Non-advisory volunteering that keeps free legal clinics moving.

Civics tutoring

Teach government and civics to younger students through LEAP Tutoring.

Chapter life

A year in the Pre-Law chapter.

The events and projects we're building the founding year around. (These illustration slots become real photos as soon as we host them — of you, maybe.)

Leadership

Founding officer roles — open now.

Chapters are student-run. Founding officers build this from day one, which is exactly the kind of leadership colleges and employers notice.

Role 01

Chapter President

Owns the vision, runs meetings, and represents the chapter to the school and to LEAP national.

Role 02

Onboarding Lead

Interviews and welcomes new members, and keeps the roster and member records clean.

Role 03

Events Coordinator

Plans networking events, tours, and competitions from idea to day-of logistics.

Role 04

Sponsorship Coordinator

Builds relationships with local firms and sponsors that fund events and open internship doors.

Role 05

Service Coordinator

Organizes volunteering projects and syncs member hours with LEAP Tutoring.

Role 06

Mentorship Coordinator

Recruits professional mentors and matches them with members through the year.

Joining

Three steps in.

Tell us you're in

Fill out the interest form below — takes under a minute.

Quick interview

A short, friendly conversation with the onboarding lead about what you want out of the chapter.

Start leaping

Get your member kit, pick your first event, and log your first volunteer hours.

FAQ

Questions we hear a lot.

Do I need experience to join?

No. The chapter exists to build your experience, not to gatekeep it. If you're curious about Pre-Law, you're qualified.

How much does it cost?

Nothing. Every LEAP program is 100% free for students — that's the entire point of the organization.

How big is the time commitment?

Plan on one chapter meeting per week or two, plus the events and volunteering you opt into. Founding officers put in more — and get more out of it.

Can freshmen and sophomores join?

Yes — founding members from every grade. Starting early means more years of internships, mentorship, and leadership on your record.

What if my school doesn't have this chapter yet?

Then you might be its founder. Head to LEAP Home and request the chapter starter kit.

Exhibit A · Case Library

Supreme Court Case Library.

Twelve landmark decisions every pre-law student should know. Filter by area of law.

Exhibit B · Law School Roadmap

Your path from 9th grade to J.D.

Eight stages from high school through law school — and the LSAT resources to get you there.

1

9th–10th Grade

  • Excel academically — GPA is critical for law school
  • Join Mock Trial or debate team
  • Read one Supreme Court decision per month
  • Watch oral arguments at oyez.org
2

11th Grade

  • SAT/ACT prep
  • Build extracurriculars in policy, government, or debate
  • Research pre-law undergraduate programs
  • Start a reading list of landmark cases
3

12th Grade

  • Choose a pre-law friendly major (poli sci, philosophy, history — or anything you love)
  • Apply to strong undergraduate programs
  • Write about policy or justice experiences in essays
4

Freshman–Junior Year

  • Maintain GPA ≥ 3.7 (T-14 law schools are very GPA-sensitive)
  • Join Pre-Law Society
  • Get 1 internship at a law firm or public defender's office
  • Develop strong faculty relationships for LORs
5

Junior Year: LSAT Prep

  • Begin LSAT prep 6+ months before your test date
  • T-14 law schools generally want 170+
  • Many strong programs admit at 160–169
  • Take timed practice tests from day one
6

Senior Year: Apply

  • Take LSAT in June or October (ideal windows)
  • Submit LSAC applications — the Common App equivalent for law school
  • Request letters of recommendation early (Sept.)
  • Personal statement: why law, why you
7

Law School (3 Years)

  • 1L: Contracts, Torts, Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Property, Criminal Law
  • 2L: Electives + law review or moot court
  • 3L: Clinic, journal, bar prep courses
8

Career Tracks

  • BigLaw: corporate law at top firms
  • Public interest: nonprofits, legal aid
  • Government: DOJ, public defenders, prosecutors
  • Clerkship or academia

LSAT Resource Hub

Khan Academy LSAT
Free · Official

The only free, official LSAT prep — made in partnership with LSAC. Adaptive and well-structured.

Start here →
7Sage Free Trial
Best for Logic Games

The best explanations for Logical Reasoning. Video walkthroughs of every official LSAT question.

Try 7Sage →
LSAC PrepTests
Official · Small cost

The only truly official practice tests — released by LSAC. Buy in bundles for best value.

Get PrepTests →
Blueprint Free LSAT Class
Strong intro course

A free intro class covering all three LSAT sections. Good for getting your bearings before committing to a program.

Blueprint →
r/LSAT
Community · Free

Reddit's LSAT community — score reports, strategy threads, study schedules, and peer support.

r/LSAT →
Exhibit C · Brief Writing

Legal Brief Writing Workshop.

IRAC — Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion — is how lawyers think. Study the example, then write your own on this week's prompt.

Example Brief: Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

Issue
Whether public school students' First Amendment rights are violated when schools prohibit symbolic political speech that causes no actual disruption.
Rule
The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, including symbolic expression. This protection extends to students in public schools. Schools may restrict speech only when it causes — or is reasonably forecast to cause — a substantial disruption to school activities.
Application
Here, wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War was silent, passive political expression. The school had no evidence of actual disruption — only a generalized fear. The school's "undifferentiated fear" did not satisfy the substantial-disruption threshold. Tinker's protest did not materially interfere with schoolwork or discipline.
Conclusion
The school's prohibition violated Tinker's First Amendment rights. The Court held that students do not "shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate" — a phrase that has anchored student speech law ever since.

This Week's Prompt

Brief submitted! Your IRAC appears below.
Exhibit D · Weekly Challenge

Constitutional Challenge.

One constitutional law question per week. Test your knowledge. Read the explanation.

This week's question

Loading...

Exhibit E · Self-Run Kits

Mock Trial Self-Run Kit.

Three complete kits your chapter can run in any classroom — no outside facilitator required.

Complete Mock Trial Case Kit — Civil: Personal Injury / Slip and Fall +

A complete fictional case that runs in 45–60 minutes in any classroom. Print and go — no prep required beyond distributing roles.

  • 4-page fictional case summary: Rivera v. Oakdale Supermarkets (slip and fall in a grocery store)
  • Plaintiff attorney roles (2): opening statement, 2 direct examinations, closing
  • Defense attorney roles (2): opening statement, 2 cross-examinations, closing
  • 3 plaintiff witnesses with full backstories: plaintiff, eyewitness, medical expert
  • 3 defense witnesses: store manager, security guard, expert witness
  • Judge instructions card (procedural script for student judge)
  • Jury deliberation guide (8 questions, structured process)
  • Verdict form with signature lines

Access: This kit will be available for download once chapter leadership approves it. Join the chapter to receive it directly.

Moot Court Oral Argument Kit — Appellate Advocacy Practice +

Eight practice prompts for 5-minute-per-side oral arguments, plus a rubric for peer scoring. Works with 2–4 advocates and a panel of 3 student judges.

Practice prompts include:

  • First Amendment: Can a school district ban a student's off-campus social media posts?
  • 4th Amendment: Does a cell phone's GPS history constitute a "search" without a warrant?
  • Contract Law: Is a verbal agreement to split lottery winnings legally enforceable?
  • Equal Protection: Does a state's voter ID law disparately impact minority voters?
  • And 4 additional prompts covering privacy, due process, and federalism

Scoring rubric (100 points)

Delivery and clarity25 pts
Case law and authority cited25 pts
Rebuttal quality25 pts
Professionalism and courtroom decorum25 pts
Mock Jury Deliberation Exercise — Robbery with Conflicting Testimony +

A 2-page case summary with deliberately conflicting eyewitness accounts. Students serve as a 12-person jury and deliberate to a verdict. Used in law school simulations — adapted for high schoolers.

  • 2-page case summary: State v. Morales — alleged robbery with 2 conflicting eyewitnesses
  • Instructions for seating a student jury and electing a foreperson
  • Deliberation guide: 10 structured discussion questions
  • Verdict form with guilty / not guilty / hung jury options
  • Debrief discussion questions: What made this hard? What would you need to convict?
  • Notes on reasonable doubt and how real juries are instructed

Timing: Full deliberation runs 25–40 minutes. Allow 10 minutes for debrief. Works best in groups of 12–16.

Exhibit F · Legal News

This Week in Court.

The 5 most interesting legal stories and Supreme Court updates — updated weekly.

Updated every Monday · Week of July 7, 2026
  • 01 · July 7, 2026

    SCOTUS Grants Cert in United States v. Williams

    Case could reshape Fourth Amendment search-and-seizure doctrine for digital devices. Oral arguments expected next term.

    Read more →
  • 02 · July 7, 2026

    Federal Court Orders EPA to Reconsider Lithium Mine Permit

    Landmark environmental ruling finds EPA failed to adequately consult with tribal nations before issuing permit near sacred lands in Nevada.

    Read more →
  • 03 · July 7, 2026

    14 States Challenge FTC Non-Compete Rule

    Joint brief filed arguing the FTC exceeded its authority. Oral arguments scheduled for September in the Fifth Circuit.

    Read more →
  • 04 · July 7, 2026

    Supreme Court's Next Term Preview

    Three major cases on First Amendment, immigration, and redistricting already accepted. Opening arguments begin in October.

    Read more →
  • 05 · July 7, 2026

    Law School Applications Up 12% This Cycle

    LSAC reports the largest applicant pool since 2010, intensifying competition at T-14 programs. Median LSAT scores at top schools continue to rise.

    Read more →

Subscribe to Weekly Digest

Get a curated legal news summary every Monday morning.

You'll get a summary every Monday!
Exhibit G · Moot Court

Moot Court Oral Argument Practice.

12 argument prompts with a scoring rubric — record a 3-minute argument and share for peer feedback.

This Week's Prompt

Rotating weekly · Argue the affirmative position

Loading...

Scoring Rubric

CriteriaPointsWhat Judges Look For
Opening Hook20Does the argument begin with a clear, compelling framing that orients the judge?
Rule Statement20Is the applicable legal standard stated accurately and succinctly?
Application of Facts20Are specific facts used to apply the rule? Are analogies to precedent drawn?
Rebuttal20Does the advocate acknowledge the opposing argument and dismantle it?
Conclusion & Delivery20Is the ask clear? Is delivery confident, measured, and professional?

Submit Your Argument

Submitted! Your argument appears below for peer feedback.
Exhibit H · Shadow Match

Law Student Shadow Match.

Request a 30-minute informational call with a law student or practicing attorney — LEAP facilitates the match.

1

Submit Request

Fill out the form below with your interest area and top question.

2

LEAP Matches You

We match you with a law student or attorney within 72 hours.

3

30-Minute Zoom Call

Ask your questions, get real answers from someone on the path.

47 students matched so far
Request submitted! We'll be in touch within 72 hours.

"My call with a Stanford law student completely changed how I think about law school applications."

Jordan T. · 11th Grade

"I learned more in 30 minutes than in a semester of mock trial."

Sofia M. · 12th Grade

"She walked me through her entire 1L experience. I know exactly what to prepare now."

Marcus K. · 10th Grade
Exhibit I · Annual Competition

Annual LEAP Mock Trial Competition.

An original case file released each fall — chapters compete in virtual courtroom rounds judged by law students and attorneys.

2026 Case File

State v. Rivera

A high school student is charged with cyberbullying after allegedly hacking a classmate's social media account. Defense argues the state's cyberbullying statute is unconstitutionally vague under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

  • Full Case Summary (4 pages)
  • Witness Statements — Victim, Defendant, Expert Witness
  • Exhibit A: Chat Logs
  • Exhibit B: Expert Report on Digital Forensics
  • Judge's Instructions
  • Verdict Form

Competition Timeline

Sept 1, 2026

Case File Release

Sept–Nov

Practice Window

Dec 6–7, 2026

Virtual Rounds

Jan 2027

Championship

Register Your Chapter

Registered! You'll receive the case file on Sept 1, 2026.

State v. Rivera — Case Summary Preview

Background: On March 4, 2026, defendant Alex Rivera, age 16, allegedly gained unauthorized access to the Instagram account of classmate Morgan Delgado using a phishing link sent via text message. Rivera denies hacking the account, claiming Delgado voluntarily shared the password weeks prior.

Charges: One count of cyberbullying under State Statute §740.3 ("Unlawful Electronic Harassment"), which prohibits using electronic means to "harass, intimidate, or embarrass" another person.

Defense argument: Statute §740.3 is unconstitutionally vague — it fails to define "intimidate or embarrass" with sufficient clarity, chilling protected speech. Defense will move to dismiss on First and Fourteenth Amendment grounds.

Full 4-page case file available to registered chapters on Sept 1, 2026.

Founding members wanted

Be a founding member of the Pre-Law chapter.

The people who join first shape everything — the events, the culture, the opportunities. Put your name in.

Request to join →